Tuesday, June 17, 2008

T-Shirt Can(n)ons


Jeebus.
I've been obsessed with this record from afar since I was 14 years old, always wondering if I'd ever grow the moral imagination necessary to identify with the sagas and the sexes of Jagger embodied in the glorious, vacuous, sensuous and innocuous cover snap.
Anyway, another 14 years of living passed before I got around to doing the right thing and checking this dog out of the library, and let me tell you, well, shit. Jeepers. 1/2 these tracks feature a GE Smith-y band with GE Smith. but the other half is presided over by MATERIAL, Bill Laswell's no wave squad from downtown nyc.
Who knew?!? And who'd've guessed that even the difference between GE Smith and Bill Laswell could be entirely washed over in Emotional Rescue-ish production values and overwrought, campy affectations from a man who is campy and overwrought even when he's also comatose.

I like it, all told. Of course it's not as good as Emotional Rescue, but then again, neither is college football.


Speaking of no wave, it'd seem that said "genre" is now officially important, as both pitchfork generation and forced exposure generation luminaries have been allowed to hold forth in that glossy, social history manner made famous by Please Kill Me! (If this trend continues, it'll only be a decade or two before you, me and pierre bourdieu's niece are all writing semi-autobiographical novellas about the graduate employee movement.)

As a Sonic Youth fan-boy since prepubescence and a former Knitting Factory employee, I never imagined a moment where Teenage Jesus and the Jerks'd be elevated to coffee table fare. But then, if Bill Laswell was already pulling checks out of Mick Jagger by 1985, clearly I'm the falcon with the wax on his wing here.

Bonus Survey Questions? Sure. Let's tackle new wave.
1) Do you consider Cheap Trick to be a new wave outfit?
2) Who is less overrated, David Byrne or Elvis Costello?
3) Are the Pretenders and/or Tom Petty and/or Television new wave outfits in your mind? M'point, of course, is to say that new wave is as vaguely defined (and awesome) as is no wave.

The Italian Problem

I have a co-worker who is rooting for the Eye-ties during the Euro 2008 Cup. She is doing so largely based on the fact that the Eye-ties are babelicious. This is fine. Attractiveness is a fine reason to root for anyone. Some, but certainly not myself, would argue that it is the only reason to watch women's tennis.

The problem comes in where she seems to be under the impression that I, too, should be rooting for the Italians. My resistance to this proposal is greeted with incredulousness. My protests that the Italians are divingest, cheatingest, most soccer desecrating people on the planet and that no one who is not Italian roots for the Italians are rejected. Apparently, I fail to grasp exactly how awesome looking these men are.

Go France Romania!

Monday, June 16, 2008

The art of rhetoric

You've got to hand it to Wes Vernon - he tells you exactly what he's about in the first two sentences:
First off, this is a column about national security — period.

Wait for it...
It is not about homosexuality per se.


I don't want to know about whatever lawful activity two civilians — in a civilian setting — conduct behind closed doors. It's none of my business.

Wherein the totally not homophobic Mr. Vernon launches into a high-minded discourse about national security (period) that has nothing to do with homosexuality. Except that allowing teh gehys in the military will somehow rapidly cripple that institution, possibly due to the sudden overwhelming influx of toasters.

Harsh medicine

At least one Michigander reads this, so I'll appeal to him for some enlightenment while the rest of us speculate wildly.

The setting Al Gore's endorsement of Obama (to which is due an entirely expected but nevertheless enthusiastic "BOOM!") in Michigan struck me as interesting. Given the UAW's hostility to any sort of legislation or regulation which acknowledges and acts upon the threat of global climate change, I wonder how a Gore endorsement is received by the families in Michigan who are still dependent upon the automotive industry. Likewise, I was also struck by comments Obama made while campaigning in the state:
Obama focused on his plan to improve the economy while in Michigan, which has the nation's highest unemployment rate. He told a crowd in Flint, which had a seasonally unadjusted April unemployment rate of 9.3 percent, that they cannot fear globalization but must embrace it as a reality of the future.

"At critical moments of transition like this one, success has also depended on national leadership that moved the country forward with confidence and a common purpose," he said.

Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but it seems like Obama sent a pretty big message to Detroit about what his priorities are going to be, and while I think the priorities (attention to energy policy that will necessarily impact automobile manufacturers, new investment spending, possibly as assistance for economically dislocated workers) are solid, I'm wondering if this is a bitter pill to swallow in Michigan.

crap/not crap: Obama on Public Education

from an ABC interview.

TAPPER: But one of the ways that proponents of school choice say that the best way to change the status quo is to give parents, inner-city parents a choice. Why not?

OBAMA: Well, the problem is, is that, you know, although it might benefit some kids at the top, what you're going to do is leave a lot of kids at the bottom. We don't have enough slots for every child to go into a parochial school or a private school. And what you would see is a huge drain of resources out of the public schools.

So what I've said is let's foster competition within the public school system. Let's make sure that charter schools are up and running. Let's make sure that kids who are in failing schools, in local school districts, have an option to go to schools that are doing well.

But what I don't want to do is to see a diminished commitment to the public schools to the point where all we have are the hardest-to-teach kids with the least involved parents with the most disabilities in the public schools. That's going to make things worse, and we're going to lose the commitment to public schools that I think have been so important to building this country.

A Message From Dave and Patrick

They screwed my dad over by shipping him down to Klamath Falls, then firing him two years later. But, hey, it's the fast food trade, they're not gonna make sweet love to ya all night long.

Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

Even I think this is inappropriate.

Caution: Blogs May Be Hazardous to Your Health

Wow, who knew we were engaged in such a weighty and potentially perilous venture here? I came across the following on my university's Counseling and Wellness Center web site. Apparently we bloggers have the potential to do grievous harm...

If you or someone you know has been the victim of anonymous online blogging…

What effects can hostile blogging have on someone?
Though it may seem harmless to the poster, the person on the receiving end can feel publicly humiliated and helpless to address it. The unfairness and anonymity of the attacks can cause a sense of being victimized and lead to apprehension and avoidance of social situations and/or classes. We all want to feel safe in public and this includes feeling safe from attacks on our character.

The stress of these attacks may exacerbate other normal stresses and cause the person to feel very anxious or depressed, violated, or irritable. Sometimes the attacks result from conflict or perceived rejection in relationships and the intent of the poster is to harm, though the effects can be more severe than anticipated. This then is a form of relationship violence. No wonder the target of the post has a strong reaction.

What are some ways to cope with hostile blogging?

  • Find supportive friends and let them know how you feel so they can support you and reassure you about your value and importance to them. Don’t allow yourself to get socially isolated.
  • Maintain routines that make you feel good about yourself and give you a sense of order or control in your life.
  • Remind yourself consciously of all your positive qualities. Although the feelings of humiliation can be quite strong, remember that the attacks are unfair, gross distortions and often motivated by feelings of inadequacy or plain insensitivity on the part of the poster. Keep it in perspective.
  • Know the impact of the post will subside, and readers will move on to the next piece of gossip. There are also a large number of readers who regard the attacks as ridiculous and immature.
  • Resist temptation to retaliate against the post by responding or posting about the person you think did it. This backfires as it draws more negative attention to the issue.
  • Avoid reading the posting again, as this will keep the feelings raw and intense.

What supports are available on campus?

  • Consider speaking with a Counseling and Wellness therapist. This is a confidential and private visit than can validate how you feel and help you explore how to cope with this.
  • Contact the Dean of Students’ Office. They’re very concerned about anonymous blogging and can provide additional support.

Feel free to contact Student Legal Services to learn more about your legal rights in this situation.


"Hostile blogging." It's (apparently) a serious problem, people! Let's all be careful not to let our insensitivities or feelings of inadequacy cause us to use our words in ways that might make others feel violated, humiliated, or socially isolated. (Not that any of us are inadequate, of course; we're all special, important people with many good qualities!) After all, we all want to feel safe on the internets, right? And if any of you are feeling anxious, depressed, or irritable, you can always come to me for support! Group hug!


Saturday, June 14, 2008

Saturday five

My query to you: name five bands that changed your life.

To be clear, I'm setting the bar pretty high with "changed your life." I want you to name bands that if you hadn't discovered them when you did, it's entirely conceivable that you would not be the person you are today. Here's mine (in order of discovery):
  1. the Beatles
  2. REM
  3. the Minutemen
  4. the Flaming Lips
  5. Phish
Leave yours in the comments.

As Latin America Goes, So Goes...




Greg Grandin's recent recent writing on an Obama policy for Latin America transcends any such political 'presentism' or hero-worship, and instead offers a vital and occasionally horrifying crystal ball in which to peer. As staging ground for some of the most hateful, inexcusable adventures in government, empire, and murder, Grandin argues that the region has always worked as a sort of laboratory for new technologies of capitalist government that would eventually extend outward (c.f., Friedman's neoliberalism in Chile.) But at the moment, Grandin wonders if the Right's racial and ideological compulsions haven't taken them to a place of temporary hysterical inefficacy.
The Right's decay as an intellectual force is nowhere more evident than in the fits it throws in the face of the Left's—or China's—advances in Latin America. The self-confidant vitality with which Jeane Kirkpatrick used Latin America to skewer the Carter administration has been replaced with the tinny, desperate shrill of despair. "Who lost Latin America?" asks the Center for Security Policy's Frank Gaffney—of pretty much everyone he meets. The region, he says, is now a "magnet for Islamist terrorists and a breeding ground for hostile political movements… The key leader is Chávez, the billionaire dictator of Venezuela who has declared a Latino jihad against the United States."
So far Obama seems to kind of a Clinton revivalist, economically speaking. Will his administration take us to a place in which Third Way, capitalist cosmopolitanism makes it's second historical appearance (in the 1990s as tragedy, in 2009 as farce?) Will we see a batch of new trade agreements? Continued, contrived saber-rattling at Chavez? something like peace talks in Colombia? micro-credit for nominally socialist democracies? A less austere, more paternalistic disposition from the IMF/World Bank? Historic summit conferences, at least?

Friday, June 13, 2008

Happiness...

... is the Group C standings.

Solidarity in Action

Once upon a time, the GTFF held an old-school mock funeral for our expired contract.

Overcome with emotion Wobs breaks down. EZ reaches out to him.

Difficult iPod Transitions

I think we all love our iPods in shuffle mode for the times two songs we never would have put together get played next to back-to-back. These surprising combinations often bring a new dimension to songs we've been listening to for years, revealing layers of meaning that we may not have noticed before (or may be inventing for the first time).

Sometimes, however, iPod gets it wrong and plays two songs back-to-back that just don't belong together and I find myself reaching for the skip button. I call these "Difficult iPod Transitions."

In what I hope will become a regular, if random, feature of the OG (I hope all of my colleagues will participate), I present my DIT from yesterday:

Pitbull's Bojangles

to

Frank Sinatra's Strangers in the Night

Of course, I did realize that both artists were essentially singing songs to ladies they were dancing with, emphasizing their desire to continue the interlude in a more martial setting. Pitbull stating quite clearly his preference for being pleasured orally and his perfect willingness to reciprocate, while Frank left the details to my imagination. Not surprisingly, I imagined Frank in a more missionary context.

h/t: Wobs for the proper punctuation

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

A little matter of journalism

In an article about groups seeking to influence the Democratic Party's education agenda, this bit caught my attention:
Mr. Klein and Mr. Sharpton’s statement argued that federal policy should continue to hold schools accountable for raising the achievement of poor African-American and Latino youths, which is a focus of the federal law, but should also seek to assign more effective teachers to the nation’s neediest classrooms. This is an area where the statement said the law had been weak.

[...]

The statement included a passage labeling teachers union contracts a significant obstacle to increasing the achievement of poor students.

“We must insist that our elected officials confront and address head-on crucial issues that created this crisis: teachers’ contracts and state policies that keep ineffective teachers in classrooms and too often make it nearly impossible to get our best teachers paired up with the students who most need them,” it said.

Leaving the substance of the charge aside, you would think that such a statement - such a singled out statement - would call for a response from a representative of a teachers union. In fact, you would think that an article on groups attempting to shape education policy would call for the inclusion of a comment from someone in a teachers union.

You would think.

To Go With Your Curious George Shirt

This obviously won't be the worst thing we see this election cycle, but what a way to start us off!

via LGM, Pandagon

Irrational exhuberance

Yes, I do know that we're only 65 games in to a 162 game season, but my beloved Cubbies currently have the best record in baseball. I'm feeling... what's the word I'm looking for...? Hopeful? Optimistic? Are Cubs fans supposed to have these strange emotions?

You may place your bet for when, exactly, my heart gets broken in the comments.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

PR Savvy

From The Guardian:
To some it may come as too little too late. But setting out on his final trip to Europe as president, George Bush has expressed regret that his rhetoric in the run-up to the war in Iraq may have created the impression that he was a warmonger.

[...]

The phrases he used to win support for the war such as "bring 'em on" and "dead or alive" he said, "indicated to people that I was, you know, not a man of peace."

Sure, your rhetoric might have created that impression. But actually starting an unprovoked war kinda confirmed to us that you're a, you know, warmonger.

updated: Note to self - when you think you're being clever, check Sadly, No! first to make sure you're not ripping them off.

Bambino blogging

Not so bambino-y anymore.
Photobucket

Nothing New about These Neoliberals

Yuck, the noble adversary over at the Washington Note couples his always pretty crackling analysis with this gloomy glimpse into Obama's economic team, which includes nobody from the Economists for Edwards (sigh), and generally looks pretty flaccid. We pick up with a discussion of the newest Obama-economist, Jason Furman.
Furman (a friendly acquaintance of mine and close associate of one of my New America Foundation colleagues) is also well known for his budget-hawkery. He has been part of the Democratic Party economic class that has successfully stolen from the Republicans the ethic of fiscal conservatism and advocates a Social Security entitlement reform process that begins to wrestle with America's long term entitlement obligations.

To some degree, Furman manifests the interests and perspective of perhaps the leading neoliberal force in politics today, Robert Rubin. Furman could make a good case that his views may differ here and there, but my sense is that he's an essential spear-carrier of Rubinomics.

Given the rhetoric of Obama on redoing trade deals, of giving China a tough time on trade, and focusing on the real needs of working class Americans -- the choice of Furman surprises me though I certainly don't oppose it.

But calling a spade a spade, it's clear that Furman is no Dean Baker or Robert Blecker or Jared Bernstein -- all important economists who have been far more right as of late than the Rubin crowd in anticipating the stress points in globalization, the housing bubble, trade, and the like.

If We Weren't Talking at Cross-Purposes, We Wouldn't Be Talking

This reminded me of a conversation that could take place between myself and Lex. It actually took place between baseball announcers Joe Morgan and Jon Miller during a broadcast on Sunday.

"Jon, I gotta ask you a trivia question. I was fishing with Matt Franco, used to play for the Mets. I was fishing with him on a boat, and Matt Franco asked me this trivia question. He said he had talked to players past and present. He asked me, Which guy hit the hardest line drives most consistently of all I'd ever seen. Hardest line drives."- Joe Morgan
"That's a trivia question?"- Jon Miller
"Well, it was for me and him. We were playing trivia on the fishing boat."- Joe
"Where would I look up the answer to that?"- Jon
"Well, you should know the answer!"- Joe
"Give me the question one more time."- Jon
"All right. Who hits the hardest line drives of any player you ever saw on a consistent basis?"- Joe
"Dave Winfield."- Jon
"All right, keep going. That's one. That's "A". "A" wasn't right.- Joe
[Loud Laughs] "Yes it was right! I beg to differ!"- Jon
"I'm gonna give you, uhh … I'm gonna give … I'm gonna give you a hint. You even broadcast games for him."- Joe
[Long Pause] "I broadcast Dave Winfield's games."- Jon
"No … for the answer, I'm talking about. I'm telling you, he asked all the other players. I'm not saying—"- Joe
"Well, I'm saying, this is a question for which there is no correct answer."- Jon
"Yeah, there's a correct answer."- Joe
"Well, what did you say? What was your answer? Did you get it right?"- Jon
"Yes." [pause] "Al Oliver."- Joe
"Oh, Al Oliver. He was—"- Jon
"See!"- Joe
"He was a very good line drive hitter."- Jon
"I knew you would say that. See, I knew that you'd eventually come up with the answer."- Joe
[Al Oliver and Dave Winfield Talk]
"It was interesting because Matt Franco said if I got the answer correct, he would introduce to his cousin … the actor … Kurt Russell. And I said, 'Okay.'- Joe
"That's his cousin?"- Jon
"That's his cousin."- Joe
[Laughs] "So when did you meet Kurt?"- Jon
"Well I haven't met him yet. I just answered it last week."- Joe
"Well, what's taken him so long? We're in L.A. Kurt could have been here tonight. Or maybe he wants to wait till you're in New York, and we can help Kurt Russell … escape from New York."- Jon
"Yeah, that was a great movie. Snake Plissken. The Snake."- Joe
"You want to meet him bad, don't you?"- Jon
"Yeah, that was his … That was his name. Snake."- Joe

Monday, June 9, 2008

Sorry Environment, There's Votes to Win!

I got this in an e-mail from the AFL-CIO's "Working Families" campaign.
Out-of-control gas prices are choking off the American dream for working families.
The e-mail is about how John McCain and George Bush are killing working families by giving giant tax breaks to Big Oil. A perfectly legitimate point to attack, but does the attack have to come in language that actually helps the GOP?

Isn't this what McCain was arguing when he proposed the gas-tax holiday? Isn't stabilizing the supply of oil a reason (unstated) for going to war in Iraq? Isn't this the reason we need to drill in Alaska (and California, New Mexico, Louisiana and everywhere else)? Could this line of reasoning be why the blue wing and the green wing of the Democratic party mix as well as the evangelicals and the Wall Streeters do in the Republican party?

The blue/green divide in the Democratic party is going to be a major problem in the coming years and I greatly fear that the GOP's tax-cutting, drilling, and anti-cap and trade arguments will become Labor's arguments. I fear that Labor did not learn a lesson from the Pacific Northwest timer unions...even if you buy into the bosses' anti-environmental bullshit, they are still going to shut you down the moment it becomes more profitable to use their money somewhere else.

Sensory Deprivation

Sorry that I haven't posted lately.

I am currently without phone/internet/cable.

free media is a wasteland.....

I feel like Spurlock going 30 days with no access.

h/t: Pomona public library

Terrorists everywhere!

Ever since the Obamas introduced America to the "fist bump of terror"...

... I've noticed that there's an awful lot of other people who are showing solidarity with Islamofarian America haters:




I, for one, will be hiding in my basement to avoid tangling with the Eight Iron of Allah.

Catholicism, Workers and the Poor.

When I was 18 years old back in Jersey, I was even more sophomoric, pretentious and hypocritical than my prep school. (Delbarton is situated on 400 acres of Jersey forest, and peppered with Greek statuary and Goose shit.)

I would spend studyhall mornings listening to The Shape of Jazz to Come on my walkman, while reading the Communist Manifesto or Forced Exposure in the half-lotus position.

There were a lotta coffees and bagels
snarfed down in between seminars with the half-Benedictine faculty, and a lot of really hideous things happened inside me and around me while I inhabited this prep space. But I also learned about William Faulkner, James Joyce and Marx from a lot of very smart people, some of whom - shit, they were monks - even kinda managed to retain (kinda) leftist critiques of la societe despite all the wanky, preppy computations of the place.

All of which leads up to yours truly getting tapped for a sort of volunteer trip to Camden, NJ, where unbeknownst to me there was a full-blown Liberation Theology, anti-poverty mission happening that left me duly impressed. We emptied abandoned crackhouses by day and then attended - seriously - seminars at night that were often as much about the Sandinistas as they were about transubstantiation...It's also the place where I first heard of Marx, Keynes and Neoclassical political economics.

This was a big time for Young Me, though I'd always known and/or suspected that there was potentially something radical about the cosmological and moral psychological framework called Catholicism that I'd been raised in. Grade School. At Our Lady of Sorrows in South Orange, they were always talking about poor people - poor people seemed to have a weird kind of cred, even. The overall message was something like, you are an ungrateful wretch, but look how much worse off you would be if you were that guy. "That guy" could take the form of Christ getting scourged, or a homeless man, or whatever, within the whimsical framework of this or that lay minister's moralism.

Of course, those were very American, very white ethnic, very suburban glimpses into catholic social teachings that I just provided. The AFL-CIO reminds us how Catholic Worker programs in urban America have a long, kinda bitchin', weirdly bohemian kind of legacy in American communities that need all the help they can get. I'm trying to be very deadpan about my debt here, and I've had to renounce catholicism (for more on this see the sermon chapter of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man), but rest assured that a lot of my formative exposure to the left came through this stained glass-ed prism. As of today I don't think it's any less sane to expect emancipatory action in the catholic church than it is to expect same from the Democratic Party.

Unless, of course, you're a woman, or gay, which brings me back to skepticism, secularism, and a relevant lingering question unanswered above: is catholicism more "pro-worker" or "pro-poor"? Do we even consider wage workers and the unemployed as part of the same class anymore? And back to my point, does Catholic Worker-ism actually contain some class content, or is catholic social teaching better captured in the essentialism - not to say the defeatism or conservatism - of statements such as "the Poor are Always With You."

So anyway, it's funny, a decade later, still living down the residual effects of 18 years in the eyes of the Church... to live through a media moment in which the larger culture is realizing that Liberation Theology exists, and to see it being used as a smear against Barry Obama. It's funny to watch Father Pfleger with however much lefty sympathy, and think, who finds this man frightening? Who? How? Really?

It seems equally as ridiculous as thinking John Bellamy Foster is a threat to the State Monopoly Capitalism (Stamocap).

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Brand it Down, Now

Brand our city!
The Eugene Register-Guard reports that Springfield, OR has arrived upon its very own tagline - but only after months of deliberation.

And in just a few months, local residents will see those words — Proud History, Bright Future — popping up on banners, signs, city vehicles and other spots throughout town.

The saying is not an official city motto or slogan. City spokesman Niel Laudati calls it a “tag line” that will be incorporated into a series of events and activities occurring in advance of and in conjunction with Springfield’s 125th anniversary in 2010.

Laudati said officials are confident that “Proud History, Bright Future” accurately represents what city residents and others think of Springfield.

That’s because the saying is a product of a “community imaging” survey that generated about 250 responses.
I can see the bumper stickers now:

If You Think Community Imaging is Expensive,
Try Community Imaging-less-ness

Saturday, June 7, 2008

BI Serenade

Despite what looks like at least ten initiatives/referenda soon to be weighing down Oregon ballots, the Eugene Register-Guard says it's really difficult to collect signatures these days.

Apparently signers have to fill out all their personal information for themselves, and apparently the signature-gatherer has to watch each and every signature be signed. Apparently that's bad.

It's gonna be a great run, this time, btw: anti-immigrant insanity, obscene crime bills, the shifting of lottery revenues away from schools towards public safety, Tort reform, incentive pay for teachers, paycheck deception and further anti-union diddling, etc.

What a horror show. I know Uncle is susceptible to "direct democracy" - particularly cuz it's influenced his Sun River tactics - but I look at this process and wonder, uh, really?!? Just this year alone, there's a slate of initiatives that could turn our greentastic I-5 corridor into Hatebag Alley.

I'll have a lot more to say about this weirdness, obviously - just thought I'd break the ice. Note that the legislature passed the strictures that make the initiative process more difficult. More than being just a left-right, issue-based zone of electoral struggle, the initiative process is a challenge and/or a threat to the statutory authority of the legislative process. Some would say it's a challenge to deliberative democracy in general, but Jurgen Habermas I'm not. In my admittedly dim, crusty but not hungover view, "Deliberative Democracy" can only be fetishized by someone ignorant of liberalism's complicity with capitalist penetration, slavery, patriarchy, etc. I don't think "rational discourse" is an end in itself, so my analysis of the initiative process , hopefully, will always be more than liberal.

The Euros Are Here!

And just in time, without hockey I'm going into Euro-sport withdrawal (sorry French Open, the clay courts of Roland Garros are no siren to these eyes).

I've been in something of a retro seventies vibe as of late. Nothing like putting on some aviators and talking gas crisis to make a guy pine for a little grass, sweet summer nights, mellow grooves on the radio, and maybe some cocaine later in the evening. As such, I've decided to back the Dutch this time around. I'll pretend its 1974 and Total Football will win my heart all over again. I was two last time, so winning my heart was no great feat, but still, who will ever forget the loping strides of Johan Cruyff?

I'll admit I know nothing about the modern incarnation if the Dutch squad. I do know they are in a group with the French and the I-ties, and that's enough for me to throw on my orange sweater (have I mentioned the lousy weather we are having?), hoist a cold Heinie Amstel Light (the diet's back on, baby!) and look up something Dutch to shout in encouragement of the team.

Given that Neds has a small chance of getting out of the first round, let me go ahead and pick a playoff team. In a stunner (to me), I'm going to go ahead and pick Spain. But only because half of Liverpool plays for Spain, not because I have any love of the Spaniards.

Friday, June 6, 2008

Please don't

I get the feeling I'm going to be writing a bunch of these.

Dear Bay Area local color pundit guy (h/t),

A substantial portion of the U.S. population - including, I imagine, a surprisingly significant number in your readership - is going to be coming to grips with the possibility of casting a presidential ballot for a black man. Many will struggle with the decision solely on the basis of race, and some may manage to break through their previously comfortable ways of thinking. It's a significant challenge for Senator Obama to overcome. That's why no one needs to know about this:
Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul.

Did we learn nothing from Dennis Kucinich? We love Kucinich! We love it when he offers us red meat. We love his stands on the issues. We love his wife. But he's a vegan who hangs with Shirley MacLaine, so watch out.

With that in mind - do we really want to present Obama as some sort of New Age crystal healer?

Oh, Canada!

As far as I can tell, these are real. Allegedly (I'm not convinced, obviously) they are Canadian Public Service Announcements that (possibly) never aired. But were made for real.

I'm kind of too fucked up about them to comment, so you all please do.

Adblock

Canadian Domestic Abuse PSA - Watch more free videos

Adblock

Canadian Domestic Abuse PSA 2 - Watch more free videos

¿Cómo usted dice "moron" en español?

I'm all for bilingual ballots to help our Spanish-speaking brothers and sisters participate in the democratic process. On the other hand, I'm also certain that Hispanic voters can discern between a pro-multicultural candidate and an idiot.

veepstakes probuhm savved

Hillary, Swillary, Swoo! In actuality, Barack Obama's veep needs to be one of these two:

Fidel Castro (Communist, Cuba)
Talking Points for Castro as Veep

Okay, so first of all, Castro dropped a groovy non-endorsement recently, calling Barry "the most progressive candidate to the U.S. presidency." That was effing huge.

Secondly? I mean, shit, Cuba's got like "the dankest" organic farming going on in the world today.

Fuck governors.
why bring on a governor when there are people out there in the world who have executive experience like FC?

Also, this guy's like, even older than McCain, and has better ideas about distribution of wealth than any American president of the last four decades (at least.) When I see video, it seems like everybody's just rolling around in vintage cars and playing ethnic music, down there.

Most importantly, this Castro nomination'd end Right Wing speculation about whether to cast Obama as a McGovern-style wimpy/pissy liberal or as a more dangerous (i.e., black) man with New Left patrons. 'Truth be told, Obama's ascendancy betokens a so-often-unstated, alien usurpation of the DNC. Barry Obama is, in truth, a Pabloist. (The ISO is gonna be on Obama like flies on shit, mark my words. )


Steve Albini (Shellac of North America, the Britt Walford snare sound on the Breeders' Pod)
Talking Points for Steve Albini as veep

Barack Obama needs to be slightly more antagonistic (or, wheeze, "populist") in positioning himself for the general election. That's hard for him because it's not allowed for black people to be antagonistic, ever. And also it's hard for Barry because he's a nerd. Albini is the prototypical "antagonistic nerd," who's taken being smart as far as one can down the road of engagement, malice, irony, etc. These are the forms of tussling that Obama can evoke without horrifying stupid white people such as myself.

Steve Albini laments the vertical integration and/or capitalist penetration of music-making and /or the "record industry," and Barry as we know is rooting out (some of) the financial weeds that long needed rooting at the DNC.

And of course Obama would do well to recall that the pitchfork generation and the pigfuck generation are not the same thing. Albini totally bridges the gap between everyone from Ministry fans to Forced Exposure readers, both of which are as we know, increasingly "loud and proud" and/or "fast and loose" with the $25 donations paypal-style.

(Okay, either these two or Ed Rendell.)


Thursday, June 5, 2008

Easy solutions for stupid concerns


There are no stupid questions, Eric, just stupid people

This kind of "concern" drives me fucking nuts:
As the Mariners played the Boston Red Sox on May 26, Sirbrina Guerrero and her date were approached in the third inning by an usher who told them their kissing was inappropriate, Guerrero said.

The usher, Guerrero said, told them he had received a complaint from a woman nearby who said that there were kids in the crowd of nearly 36,000 and that parents would have to explain why two women were kissing.

[...]

"I would be uncomfortable" seeing public displays of affection between lesbians or gay men, said Jim Ridneour, a 54-year-old taxi driver. "I don't think it's right seeing women kissing in public. If I had my family there, I'd have to explain what's going on."

Allow me to demonstrate:
Scene: wobs and l'il wobs at local event
l'il wobs: Dad, why are those two men/women/furries kissing?
wobs: Because they like each other and kissing people you like is fun. Now get your finger out of your nose.

See? Easy! And you didn't have to ruin anyone's evening!

Those Pesky Racist Voters

Leave it to some sports blogger who probably hasn't left his mother's basement in quite some time to nail what I've been harping on for some time now.

It's columns like this that make me realize that I have something to say, but won't ever say it as well as others. At least I can be linky.

From Kissing Suzy Kolber:

Chris Matthews: Turning our attention to the general election, Tim, what do you think we can expect over the next five months here? I think it’s gonna be really, really interesting!

Tim Russert: Me too. I think there’s gonna be a lot of healthy debate. We’re gonna find out a great deal about these two candidates, John McCain and Barack Obama. There’s still a LOT we don’t know about Obama. Right now, we only know his entire life story, the names of everyone he’s ever met, his entire political platform, his voting record, what he likes to eat, and this full body CT scan that was taken just 10 minutes ago. But there is still a LOT we just don’t know. And that’s all gonna be revealed. It’s going to be very, very interesting.

Chris Matthews: Well, before we get to that, let’s look back for a moment. Tim, we’ve been through, what was it? 50 states, and 54 primaries, with over 34 million people voting? That’s AMAZING! And this thing was so close the whole time through! How was Hillary Clinton able to keep this thing so close even when Barack Obama was beating her like a Bensonhurst housewife all through March?

Tim Russert: Two words, Chris. RACIST VOTERS. That was the one key segment of the population that Obama, for whatever reason, just could not get through to.

Chris Matthews: That’s amazing.

Tim Russert: It really is. If Obama wants to win this election, he’s going to have to do a better job reaching out to those hardcore racist voters. I want you to look at some of these polling numbers. Now these are FASCINATING. Racist voters alone make up more than 40% of the electorate.

Chris Matthews: Oh, wow!

Tim Russert: And they’re really crucial in swing states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania, Northern Florida, and pretty much any area more than 5 miles away from any major US city. That’s a big voting bloc that Hillary Clinton was able use as a base. Perhaps they admired her sheer force of will. Who knows. Now, the question is: will those racist voters stay with Obama, or will they vote for John McCain instead?
Follow the link for more advice for how Obama can reach out to these "racist voters," including advice from Pat Buchanan!

EW Letter of the Week

The rhetoric about Californians moving to and ruining Oregon used to be pretty heavy back in the '70s and '80s. Oh, Lord we hated those damn Californians. We didn't say "Don't Californicate Oregon" as much as you might think, but maybe only because words like "fornicate" weren't used around the children.

We don't hate on the Californians as much any more. Possibly because they didn't heed our warnings and moved here and destroyed Oregon anyway. It could also be because we Oregonians discovered that Californians were willing to pay ridiculously large sums of money for our houses. It's hard to hate someone who's buying your house for $100,000 more than it is worth.

Also, I think the Californians caught on with opening your public discourse with the phrase "I'm from California..." was the surest way to get people to automatically reject whatever came out of your mouth next. Fortunately for us, Patricia Burkart, formerly of Santa Cruz, CA, did not get the memo. Her letter-to-the-editor of the Weekly is so over-the-top for I second I thought it might be parody. I mean, she mentions that she is from California twice and then takes a swipe at backwardness of we Eugeneans. I don't guess that it is a parody, but either way, I salute Patty's efforts to remind us of the good ol' days.

REFORMAT CALENDAR

As someone who for 30 years read the comparable Santa Cruz Good Times weekly, I grew accustomed to a certain ease in negotiating the listed entertainment options. Now, as a Eugene resident, repeatedly I find your calendar of events irritatingly difficult to navigate.

Here are some suggestions.

Bother to write the address, time, phone number and cost of events at each mention of said event. Your modus operandi is to refer readers to some other section/page to get the relevant data. Each time you do this, I feel like using you as fire starter.

Another problem is that very few of your club listings tell what genre the band plays. This is so incredibly irritating. Can’t you insist that if groups want to be listed their main genre statement be a “required field”?

Your club listing is so minimal. Why? Do you or don’t you have a stake in keeping as many clubs open as possible? The Santa Cruz Good Times graphs all the club offerings for the week on a two-page spread so that everything is obvious at a glance. For any given day you see every club, the name of the groups, the styles of music, the cover charges, the phone number, location and start time.

In your weekly a person has to go several steps on several pages before determining that the dive in question is out of town.

I go out almost every night. Just remembering my bad experiences with your rag causes my jaw to tighten.

You owe me more than an apology. You owe me reform.

And by the way, your art reviews. Well, I’ll let that slide; I don’t know your audience. All I know about them is that they insist on scruffy beards and old-timey symphony programs. Sigh.

Patricia Burkart, Eugene

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Please don't

Dear "liberal big-time pundit",
I tell this tale, of course, not merely to remind us that the better world of which Robert Kennedy so movingly spoke died aborning 40 years ago in Los Angeles. I also tell it because I see a dynamic similar to that between the Kennedy and McCarthy campaigns in the relationship between Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's equally historic campaigns, and because today's Democrats have been given a chance -- as they were not in 1968 -- to come together and make the kinds of changes they have only dreamed of over the past four decades.

I'm begging you - please don't make this presidential election about 1968. I say this as a person who stands on the shoulders of that generation and who shares many of their ideals. Seriously, though. Just. Don't.

I know it's tempting. Every election in which I've ever participated (dating back to 1992) has been about the 1960s. Draft dodging, dope smoking, bra burning... yup, we've had to rehash it all. "The Sixties generation is in power!" "We're going to smash the Sixties once and for all!" Now we have a presumptive candidate who (on a lesser historical note) is post-Boomer, who witnessed that decade not as a participant, but as a child.

And you want to start making comparisons back to the Sixties, exactly the turf that the GOP wants us to tread. You don't think they've been stockpiling all that shit on Bill Ayers for nothing, do you?

I'm not saying that there aren't important lessons to be learned from that time, and I'm certainly not implying that we've moved past the big problems that so piqued the consciences of that generation. But we must stop framing our political discourse as a running feud about what went right and wrong in the 1960s.

Same old, same old

Sometimes I think I really miss Eugene. Then other times, not so much. I'll leave it to those of you who are still there to comment on this. Things just never change, do they? Tim Lewis looks a little older and he's now distributing his videos via the YouTubes, but it just looks like more of the same to me. Do. Not. Miss.

Well I'll Be a Monkey's Nephew

It is hard to know just how grand one should be about introducing one's self to a new blog-audience when one is already so late in joining them on this hallowed, Astro Turf path. Having held up Wobs, Dave, EZ and Ash - who, by the way, I've never met, so Ash please allow me to apologize in advance - I'm hard-pressed to enter with too sprawling a manifesto.

But the hell with it
. I am coming to you live from a blog called the prisonship where I have had the pleasure of prancing, volleying, voting and vaulting alongside a very intelligent cadre of unionists, anthropologists, rockers and Sewanee alums. Effective right now I have suspended the PrisonShip's candidacy so as to join this OG-blog's Voyage of Discovery.

I will be writing at you about electoral esoterica, ballot initiatives, redistribution in Latin America, crime novels, rock records, university life, etc. Oh, and "more."

Actually, we'll tread easy on that "university life." Next Februrary I will turn 30 years old as a student, which feels sort of like being a perpetual high school senior (albeit one who attends class). Today I am a prodigal son of the university, out on loan to the labor movement; but this August, I am returning to University so I might dissertate about anti-tax blah-blah-blah, rightist libidinal shit, 527s and the capitalist state.

I also look forward to blogging to you live from the Democratic National Convention in fabulous Denver, reviewing esoteric Trotskyist tendencies, and degenerating into impenetrable and unrewarding word-games from what occasionally seems like a place of earnest engagement. It is nice to join such an important collection of MotherEffers as you MotherEffers. And in a format so universally-respected as the weblog or "blog"?!?!?

More very soon, very soon, soon.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

I Am Old



Any of you all got any idea what this means?

If you want it on a t-shirt, you can get it here.

Funny juxtaposition

This morning while eating my cereal I navigated from this story in the New York Times about Vladimir Putin's penchant for barring his critics from TV news and political talk shows (in some cases actually digitally erasing their likenesses from said programs) over to the OG, where I found 99% of the blog crossed out with strikethrough. Hmmmm....you trying to tell us something, Dave?

Monday, June 2, 2008

Somebody please buy Ferraro a dictionary...and a clue

I think Jessica over at Feministing got it right with her three-word response to Geraldine Ferraro's editorial in the Boston Globe this weekend: Please just stop.

Seriously, has Ferraro even had time to extract her foot from her mouth after her last mortifying attempt to explain the racial politics of this election? Where to even begin with what is wrong with this latest missive?

The truth is that tens of thousands of women have watched how Clinton has been treated and are not happy. We feel that if society can allow sexism to impact a woman's candidacy to deny her the presidency, it sends a direct signal that sexism is OK in all of society.


Okay, first of all: Is sexism a problem in our society? Absolutely. Has HRC been the target of sexism? Most definitely. Is Clinton going to lose the nomination to Obama because of sexism? I'm sorry, but I am having difficulty making that leap. Where is the evidence that a vote for Obama is an endorsement of patriarchy? Or that sexism is what has motivated a majority of Obama supporters? This is actually a serious question: Is there evidence to back this assertion? Does polling data confirm that a significant percentage of Obama supporters based their decision on gender? I know that poll after poll has shown that many HRC supporters voted based on race, but I don't recall seeing the gender question. (Of course, this may well be a Media Conspiracy. We'll get back to that in a minute...)

Then there's this little gem about "reverse discrimination":

Since March, when I was accused of being racist for a statement I made about the influence of blacks on Obama's historic campaign, people have been stopping me to express a common sentiment: If you're white you can't open your mouth without being accused of being racist. They see Obama's playing the race card throughout the campaign and no one calling him for it as frightening. They're not upset with Obama because he's black; they're upset because they don't expect to be treated fairly because they're white. It's not racism that is driving them, it's racial resentment. And that is enforced because they don't believe he understands them and their problems. That when he said in South Carolina after his victory "Our Time Has Come" they believe he is telling them that their time has passed.


Let's see...to start with, Geraldine, your statement in March was racist. Sorry if that's hard to hear. But in your world somehow it's Obama who is "playing the race card"? Um, call a kettle black much? White folks are upset because they "can't open their mouth without being called a racist," because they "don't expect to be treated fairly," and because Obama signifies to them that "their time has passed"? Seriously??? Please, help me understand this: I am supposed to buy into the idea of white men being oppressed by the emergence of a black leader and, out of empathy and "fairness" for these poor "Reagan Democrats" (who aren't "lucky" enough to be black), I should be mourning any minor undermining of white supremacy? Riiiiight.

However, as a media scholar I think what I find almost as annoying as Ferraro's lack of comprehension of the actual definition of racism is her plan to uncover the Vast Media Conspiracy that helped contribute to the (sexist, "reverse-racist" [sic]) plot to "get" HRC:

In response, a group of women - from corporate executives to academics to members of the media - have requested that the Shorenstein Center at Harvard University and others conduct a study, which we will pay for if necessary, to determine three things.

First, whether either the Clinton or Obama campaign engaged in sexism and racism; second, whether the media treated Clinton fairly or unfairly; and third whether certain members of the media crossed an ethical line when they changed the definition of journalist from reporter and commentator to strategist and promoter of a candidate. And if they did to suggest ethical guidelines which the industry might adopt.


Good lord. This is the kind of thing that drives people in my field up a tree. Just for fun, let's try to operationalize this in the comments, shall we? Please, let's all offer suggestions for how we will (a) define in such a way that we can (b) quantify and measure the Clinton and Obama campaigns' use of sexism and racism as campaign tactics. Don't forget, though: the Shorenstein Center studies journalism, so we won't be analyzing the campaigns themselves, but media coverage of the campaigns. Yeah, this is going to be a great study!

We can just cross number two off the list, since the Shorenstein Center has already done a study about whether the media have treated Clinton fairly or unfairly, which concluded that between January 1 and March 9, the "dominant personal narratives in the media about Clinton and Obama were almost identical in tone." In light of this, might I suggest a new number two? Let's commission a study of the Shorenstein Center to see why their media analysis is so biased in favor of Obama.

Oh, but it's number three that I love best of all: finding out (through "objective" empirical research -- which would be funded by Ferraro and the "angry women") whether "certain members of the media crossed an ethical line when they changed the definition of journalist from reporter and commentator to strategist and promoter of a candidate." Yeeeees. No agenda behind that research question. Really, how soon can this research be completed? Because I am on the edge of my chair just waiting to see the results -- not to mention the methodology section. What will be the unit of analysis here? Can we determine this by analyzing the coverage itself? Or should be looking at editorial policies and job descriptions? It's a good thing we're commissioning the great minds at Harvard to take this on, because my UO media analysis training is so not up to this challenge. Good luck, Shorenstein Center!

Really, seriously Geraldine: Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

Pretty much everything you ever needed to know about the town where I grew up

Stanley Cup Ends Tonight Wednesday

Fortunately, the Euros start Saturday.

What the hell am I going to do with my four two days off?

You're Going to Hell (Maybe)

Hey sinners!

If you felt that was a little harsh, I recommend taking the Good Person Test, brought to you by the American Family Association; you will discover that me calling you a filthy, lying sinner is nowhere as harsh as what Jesus would have to say about you. Adultering blasphemer.

What I love about this, aside from the harsh beyond-all-reason God, is that even the extremists on display here don't have the courage to live up to their own theology. If you are going to take the hard line on "Grace" v. "works," take it, but don't back out in the end with the "surrender to Jesus" bullshit. Surrendering to Jesus is an act. It is an attempt to earn one's way into Heaven. If you are going to advance the Grace argument, then we are all sinners and getting into Heaven is completely random.

Of course, now I have absolutely no reason to live by the dictates of your God, especially if being mad at someone means that I am a murderer (how many times have you murdered the Bush administration in your heart?). I have my lottery ticket to heaven, we'll see how she plays.

Shine This!

I'm from Oregon, so I love the rain. An overcast summer day in the low 70s is my idea of a perfect day. Even so...it is now June 2nd and the temperature in Eugene has hit above seventy twice all year so far (maybe thrice). The high for the day is scheduled to be 68. The high for Friday is supposed to be 58 degrees. Fahrenheit!

I could use some warmth. Not only am I tired of being cold, wearing jeans, and seeing my breath while I am grilling, this cold weather is ruining my diet. It is supposed to be warm and I am supposed to be happy with salads, breads, and more salads for dinner. Instead, I want something warm and filling.

Blogging about the weather. It has come to this. EZ, Ash, Lex! Give us something to talk about.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Oh the places you'll go

I'm not sure what it says about either our politics or our sexual culture that you can get from here -

to here -
If one wishes to gaze upon the true face of the furry fandom, then all one needs to do is click their way over to one of the many image boards dedicated to the posting of pictures of hermaphrodite dragons or adorable little cubs getting slipped the meat from an adult furry, just so people can masturbate to it. Truly, there is nothing more sobering and depressing than clicking on one of these images and reading post after post commenting on how a little fox getting raped in the ass is “deliciously erotic". Seriously.

in literally three clicks of the mouse. I'll let the Sadly,Nauts! fill in the hilariously disturbing details.

Borrowing Without Asking?

Senator Gordon Smith (R-Oregon) has a new ad out wherein he comes out against partisan gridlock and for change. *zzzzzzzz* You can view it here, if you must.

It ran frequently last night during Lost. It will be interesting to see if this is going to be a non-stop campaign until November, or if he's trying to catch the last buzz of the primary season before shutting it down for the summer.

The interesting thing about his ad is his new logo.





Does that font look familiar? Maybe you've seen it here:






My tentative understanding is that the font is not proprietary, so no scandal. Instead, one almost has to tip one's hat to Sen. Smith and hope that Merkley can keep up.

RIP Harvey Korman

You'd come into our homes weekly and make us laugh. I hope this world served you as well as you served us.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Saying the quiet part loud and the loud part quiet

If one thing can be said about the lunatic fringe of the right wing, it's that they're not ones to dance around an issue. Take, for instance, their coverage of a recently filed ballot initiative in Colorado:
"This proposed constitutional amendment will define a person in Colorado as a human being from the moment of fertilization, the moment when life begins," according to a statement at Colorado for Equal Rights."

[...]

The Colorado plan targets a loophole U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun created when he wrote the original abortion opinion.

He concluded: "(If the) suggestion of personhood [of the preborn] is established, the [abortion rights] case, of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."

By defining the unborn as a person, supporters believe, voters can simply spread the covering of constitutional protection over them, too.

Not exactly subtle, are they? Not exactly bright either. In the next paragraph, they telegraph their PR strategy, and surprise surprise! it's not about abortion:
As WND reported, a recent Colorado case highlighted what supporters describe as the need for the change.

In the case, a Colorado judge dismissed some charges against a man who caused a fatal car crash, because the victim, at 8½ months of a pregnancy, had not yet been born.

"'Person' is a defined term for purposes of the homicide statutes," wrote Judge Richard Gurley in a March decision in the case involving the death of Lileigh Lehnen, the born-alive daughter of 26-year-old Shea Lehnen.

"The definition states that 'person,' when referring to the victim of a homicide, means a human being who had been born and was alive at the time of the homicidal act," the judge said.

Disingenuous, n’est-ce pas? Because you don’t want to come right out and say, “We’re going to treat ob/gyns and women who seek to responsibly and safely terminate their pregnancies like we treat hitmen and the people who hire them.” The practical effect – and intended outcome – of this constitutional amendment is to lock up doctors and women. And if you ask me, when you spell that out to people, there’s no way in hell something this batshit insane gets approved.

Don't mourn, organize!



It’s with a heavy heart that I pass on the news that last Friday, Utah Phillips sloughed off his mortal coil after a protracted struggle with a bum ticker. For those of you who are unfamiliar with Phillips, the simplest way to describe him would be as a folk singer. But he was much more.

Utah Phillips was a living link to our past. He was a brilliant storyteller. He was a “people’s historian” in the truest sense of the term. He kept alive the oral traditions of tall tales and songs from a bygone era. He was a hobo troubadour. An organizer. An agitator. I would go so far as to say that I learned as much about labor history listening to Phillips’ folksy tenor as I did from reading dozens of books on the subject. His life and the stories he told made him something of a personal hero in a day when individuals of that caliber are exceedingly rare.

A great introduction to Phillips’ and his work can be found on the two albums on which he collaborated with Ani DiFranco, The Past Didn’t Go Anywhere and Fellow Workers (both “must owns,” in my estimation). He also left a body of solo work that is well worth checking out. Here’s a clip of him plying his trade:



Utah Phillips would be the last person to ask us to indulge in “pie in the sky when you die” eulogies. A more fitting tribute would be to continue the important work to which he dedicated his life – helping people remember their past in order to build a better future.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

A Woman's Place

Putting aside for a moment that the members of AFT have not actually voted to put anyone in office, it's nice to see AFT get a positive mention in the press.

From USA Today:
Delegates to the American Federation of Teachers' biennial meeting here [Chicago] in July are expected to elect Randi Weingarten their new president, along with two other longtime AFT officials: Antonia Cortese and Lorretta Johnson as secretary-treasurer and executive vice president, respectively.


According to the USA today, this would be the first time three women headed a "major" labor union.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

The UAW Gets It Wrong (Again)

Apparently, tough environmental standards "discriminate" against the Big Three automakers.

From Salon:
The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that the UAW is opposing a bill introduced by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D.-Calif., which would overturn the EPA's decision in December to deny California a waiver allowing the state to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.


Next thing you know, the UAW will be using jingoistic sloganeering to decry Japanese automakers "dumping" their small fuel-efficient cars on the American market...oh wait, the '80s, that's right.

A Larf For You

Goalies. *sigh*

Monday, May 26, 2008

AGEL Spring 2008

We write to affirm solidarity with all people who struggle against state violence. We all understand that within the confines of what we imagine to be the 'United States,' people face various forms of oppression that flow from the institutions of sexism, capitalism, racism, patriarchy, classism, imperialism, and homophobia among many things. We also understand that the logics of these institutions are disrupted and resisted everyday. Some of these struggles make the headlines because they qualify as easily digestible narratives. Others do not.

Given all these understandings, it is critical for us, as members of graduate employee locals, to ask ourselves, who is "we"? How are we going to define "us"? What are we calling for is a re-imagining of what types of actions does re-imagining ourselves demand? We cannot to use the word solidarity without a critical interrogation with whom and for what purpose we are invoking it. What do we do? Are we resisting oppression? Yes we are. Are we challenging the abuses of the state, and its power to create laws and structures that push people toward the margins? Yes we are. Thus, our community consists of those who are engaged in those same struggles. We haven't learned that yet. We need to learn that.

As the "academic archipelago" increasingly becomes a penal site in which our labor exploitation is not only an institutional practice, but a guiding principle of knowledge production, the need for critical engagement between graduate student locals and collaboration with insurgent intellectuals outside of the academy on combating issues of power and privilege is exigent.

It is with the explicit purpose of of challenging conventional understandings of union politics and creating communities of struggle that we are calling for the Critical Action Committee. The goal of the Critical Action Committee is to have a space where activists can discuss and create concrete plans of actions aimed at organizing across borders and boundaries such as "campus" versus "community." These divisions will continue to be meaningful as long as we continue to reify them. Organizing undergraduate students and non-tenure track instructors, working with local activists outside of the academy, or organizing with young people around issues of policing and incarceration, are things we are already doing. The activities are not peripheral to our labor organizing. Instead, it is precisely by working to unmake carceral landscapes that we create a context for fair labor. It is the aim of the Critical Action Committee to explore how we can re-center dismantling carceral landscapes in our labor organizing work. We are proposing that the Critical Action Committee meet for 2 hours at each meeting of the Alliance of Graduate Employee Locals, that each participating local dedicate at least one representative to attend the Critical Action Committee, and that meetings of the Critical Action Committee will be open to the public.
BOOM!

Gadgeting our way to green

Dave's talked about the consumerist approach to environmentalism before. Personally, I'm beginning to think that being green is the new conspicuous consumption, and this piece in the WaPo does little to disabuse me of that notion.

Don't get me wrong - I'm happy to see that people are looking to regulate their energy usage and buying more environmental savvy products (I think we have to minimize the extent of our green accolades until examining the whole process of production). Advertisers have cultivated a wonderful - and profitable - new market niche, and those who can afford it may look down their noses at their social inferiors who have yet to adopt the newest green tech.

But no matter how many people are able to live in solar-powered, compost-heated cob houses with cars run on homemade bio-fuel, it's unlikely to put much of a dent in energy consumption given that many will not be able to afford even the most basic green products, that recidivist assholes will try to more than offset personal efficiencies, and, most importantly, the development policies and infrastructure of the cheap-oil age.

In essence, we're trying to gadget our way out of a problem (and who can blame us, given 200 years of technological fixes to many of life's difficulties!) without trying to redress the underlying social relationships that are causing the problem in the first place. We need to come to the realization that a car-dependent lifestyle is quickly becoming unsustainable and work to mitigate the effects on those most vulnerable to the changes, as well as promote development in communities that encourage energy efficiency without having to buy gadgetry - walkable communities, good public transit, etc. Green technology is a great boon, so long as it's integrated in broader social changes that get at the root problem. But from where I sit, we have yet to have a serious national conversation about the problem.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

ICE with your meal?

Don't want that nasty union taste in your food? Have the workers deported....

The raids in Iowa this past week show what can be accomplished when the government and corporations really work together to Get 'r Done:


from FDL: Workers at the plant were routinely started at $5 per hour for their first three or four months on the job and then raised to $6, still well below Iowa's minimum wage of $7.25. Iowa Labor Commissioner David Neil confirmed to the Des Moines Register that Agriprocessors was being investigated by the state on suspicion of wage violations, paying people off the books and hiring underage workers... It's unclear what the raids' impact will be on the ongoing investigations into the company's workplace violations. With hundreds of workers -- and potential witnesses -- carted away, Jill Cashen, a spokesperson for the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), asked: "how can justice ever be served on these exploitation issues?" Agriprocessor's management must have been pleased with the timing of the raid. Not only did it put at least a crimp in the ongoing investigations of serious allegations of abuse by the company, it also derailed an effort by UFCW to organize the plants' workers and give them a shot at bargaining with management for better working conditions.

Lou Dobbs must be so proud.

(Not) This Date in American History

The last fourteen men alive in the Main West shaft of Centralia Coal Company's Mine #5, knowing that there was no hope of rescue, scrawled their messages of love on what scraps of paper they could find. "My dear wife: Goodbye. Name the baby Joe so you will have a Joe. Love, all. Dad."

At 3:29 pm, March 25, 1947 there was an explosion in the Main West shaft that killed one hundred and eleven men. Coal dust caught fire and spread along the shaft of the mine, killing some men instantly, choking others to death with dust and gas. While a tragedy, the explosion was not a surprise. Reports from an Illinois state inspector of mines repeatedly warned of the excessive dust in the #5 mine. The federal government had also warned of the dust, finding thirty-three major safety violations that could cause a disaster. The local union had written several letters to Illinois political figures and the officers of their parent union, the United Mine Workers of America. Unfortunately for the men of Local 52, their union was deeply involved in the effort to make unions a integral part of America, and the focus on the big picture meant that sometimes the concerns of the individual worker had to be sacrificed for the greater good.

The job of mine inspector in Illinois was a patronage job, usually going to men more concerned with cashing their check than keeping the mines safe. Illinois was the third largest coal producing state in the US at the time and coal was a factor in state politics. As such, most mine inspectors spent their time in company offices talking to company officials. When down in the mine, they were happy to be escorted by company officials, eschewing contact with the miners themselves. But the man responsible for inspecting the Centralia mine was different. Driscoll O. Scanlan rarely talked with mine mangers, preferring to spend his time with the miners in the mines. Scanlan knew that Mine #5 was a disaster waiting to happen. He told his bosses this in every report he sent them from February 1942 to March 1947.

Scanlan's reports hit the desk of Robert Weir. Weir worked under the Director of Mines and Minerals, Robert Medill. Medill's appointment as Director was a payback for political favors done for the Governor, but he was also supported by the United Mine Workers of America and the Progressive Mine Workers. Weir earned his job through the recommendation of the UWMA. When Scanlan's reports detailing the appalling conditions at the Centralia Mine came in, they were stamped "Received" and passed through Weir to a secretary who would type them up and forward them to the owner of the mine with the request that he please comply with the recommendations made. Weir signed the letters and they were mailed off to the Centralia Mine manager. This happened on a quarterly basis for some three years, but the Centralia Coal Company never responded. When they did begin responding, they did little more than issue promises to do better and excuses about manpower shortages.

When the men of UMWA Local 52 turned to their union for help, they got no response. The UMWA at the time was tied up in a high level struggle with the federal government over control of the mines. The tripartite arrangement John L. Lewis, President of the UMWA, had helped negotiate--where the government took control of the mines and the UMWA negotiated a central contract with the largest mine owners through the government--was not working out as he had expected, as the Supreme Court had just ruled that the miners had lost their right to strike when the government took control of the mines. Moreover, at the state level the UMWA was more concerned about enforcing union discipline and working with the state bureaucracy than protecting workers.

In 1932, the fifteen thousand southern Illinois miners, believing that Lewis had betrayed them in siding with coal operators over a contract dispute, had marched in Mulkeytown, Illinois in a attempt to shut down the mines and force the UMWA to consider reforms. Their march was met by a "sheriff's army" that routed the miners and crushed the picket. Soon thereafter, however, the miners would form the Progressive Miner Workers union, a union based on the idea of community-based unionism, with an emphasis on local control and moving the union beyond bread and butter issues. Unfortunately for the PMW, Lewis was a very powerful man in Illinois and had a seat on the newly formed National Labor Relations Board. The Progressive Mine Workers had no luck getting their union recognized in Illinois or by the NLRB, but, instead, faced continued government interference with the operation of their union.

Lewis' response to the trouble stirred up by the PMW was to suspend the right of UMWA's District 12 (Illinois) to elect it's own leaders. He installed Hugh "Spud" White in the president's chair as a proxy. White understood that it was his job to keep internal dissent under control and to maintain the co-operative working arrangement that the UMWA had built with the Illinois Governor's office and the Mining Board. That the UMWA had managed to install one of their own, Murell Reak, on the Mining Board (in addition to having a hand in selecting Director Medill and being able to effectively appoint his deputy) might be seen as a victory for labor. That all of these men, throughout the tragic story of the Centralia Mine #5, ignored all pleas from Local 52 and dismissed all safety reports of hazardous conditions in the interest of maintaining their friendly relations with the state government cannot.

Over a period of two years, from March 1945 to March 1947, the miners of Local 52 repeatedly petitioned the government and their union for help in enforcing the law. The Mining Board did visit the mine and perform a special "inspection," but by all accounts, they merely talked with the mine managers and went on a short ride through the main, cleanest sections of the mine. The Mining Board's subsequent report noted that there were some significant safety violations in the mine, but did little more than send the standard letter requesting that the mine owner see to these issues as soon as possible. When Local 52 would ask Spud White for help, he used the Board's report as a shield, claiming that it was the government's job, not the union's, to enforce mine safety.

John L. Lewis cried at the gravesides of the men killed in the Centralia Mine. He used the occasion to call for a six-day period of mourning, thereby instigating a nationwide strike he could use for leverage in his battle with Secretary King. The Centralia Mine Company was fined $1000, the maximum amount it could be fined for the two safety violations a jury found it guilty of. Mrs. Joe Bryant, who named her newborn daughter Joedy, received $1000 from the UMWA's Health and Welfare Fund, which was a major achievement of John L. Lewis' tripartite negotiations. Her husband's funeral expenses and bills accounted for most of this money. She and her remaining seven children (she also lost a son in the mine) would have $24 a week from the state for five years and then $20 a week from Social Security until Joedy turned eighteen.

Much of the information for this post came from:"The Blast in Centralia No. 5: A Mine Disaster No One Stopped." John Bartlow Martin. Harper's Magazine, March, 1948.

This post should be part of the series "This Date in American History." The (Not) was necessary because a couple of "This Date in History" websites dated this event as May 25, 1947. Not until I was into my research did I notice that the event actually took place on March 25th.