Friday, February 13, 2009

Un-FAZ-ed

I am listening to Defazio on the floor of the house explaining his No vote on the Stimulus....

All the money for schools out, bridges out...tax cuts in...

I wondered when the "left" was going to be heard on this issue....

As glenn points out:
The major problem now is that these entities -- the ones that ought to be applying pressure on Obama from the Left and opposing him when he moves too far Right -- are now completely boxed in. They've lost -- or, more accurately, voluntarily relinquished -- their independence. They know that criticizing -- let alone opposing -- Obama will mean that all those new readers they won last year will leave; that all those new dues-paying members will go join some other, more Obama-supportive organization; that they will prompt intense backlash and anger among the very people -- their members, supporters and readers -- on whom they have come to rely as the source of their support, strength, and numbers.

As a result, there is very little political or media structure to Obama's Left that can or will criticize him, even when he moves far to what the Beltway calls the "center" or even the Right (i.e., when he adopts large chunks of the GOP position). That situation is extremely bad -- both for the Left and for Obama. It makes impossible what very well might be the apocryphal though still illuminating FDR anecdote:

FDR was, of course, a consummate political leader. In one situation, a group came to him urging specific actions in support of a cause in which they deeply believed. He replied: "I agree with you, I want to do it, now make me do it."



IMO, labor, and other progressives should begin to make demands of the new admin, not expecting to get everything, but to help "move the goalposts", and "work the refs"

1 comment:

  1. Afterward we can "throw a kegger" and "have sex with the cheerleaders."

    ReplyDelete