So the press faces a chance to learn from the lessons of the Trump bubble. Each of these men, Gingrich and Trump, is a familiar national figure; neither of them will be the Republican nominee. Because of celebrity and personal pizzazz, they naturally are more tempting to cover than other longshots who are also not going to win the nomination. But if Gingrich coverage turns into Carnival Barkers Part Deux, we'll end up giving headline attention to disputes that have more to do with reality-show celebrity than with how Republicans will choose their issues and their candidate. The trick of balance, therefore, is to be fair to Gingrich and his arguments as long as he is in the race, much as should be the case with Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, and others, while not letting what happened with Trump happen again.Keep the focus on Mitt, cuz the rest is balderdash.
Showing posts with label chase pack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chase pack. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
The Problem of Covering Colorful but Doomed Campaigns - James Fallows - Politics - The Atlantic
Posted by
lex dexter
The Problem of Covering Colorful but Doomed Campaigns - James Fallows - Politics - The Atlantic
Labels:
chase pack,
don't call it a 'chasepack'
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Watch Out, Chasepack. Newt Approacheth.
Posted by
lex dexter
Newt in His Own Words: 33 Years of Bomb-Throwing | Mother Jones
1994 A South Carolina woman, Susan Smith, murders her two sons. Gingrich draws the only logical conclusion: "I think that the mother killing the two children in South Carolina vividly reminds every American how sick the society is getting and how much we need to change things. The only way you get change is to vote Republican."
Labels:
chase pack,
don't call it a 'chasepack'
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Haley, We Hardly Knew Ya
Posted by
lex dexter

A plain blog about politics: Winnowing
I can only repeat what I've been saying: it's not that the field is small; it's that the winnowing has begun early.
....
But, look, we call this period the "invisible primary" for a reason: just like in the state-by-state primaries to come next year, the current contest has winners and losers, and the losers tend to drop out. Now, some potential candidates really haven't contested the invisible primary...I haven't read anything, for example, about Jeb Bush. So I'll chalk him up as a "did not run." But those who hired staff, sought endorsements, traveled to Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina -- they contested the invisible primary. They were candidates for 2012. Even if they didn't quite make it all the way to 2012.
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Chasepack Screed of the Moment is by Joe Klein
Posted by
lex dexter
American Embarrassment - Swampland - TIME.com
This is my 10th presidential campaign, Lord help me. I have never before seen such a bunch of vile, desperate-to-please, shameless, embarrassing losers coagulated under a single party's banner. They are the most compelling argument I've seen against American exceptionalism. Even Tim Pawlenty, a decent governor, can't let a day go by without some bilious nonsense escaping his lizard brain. And, as Greg Sargent makes clear, Mitt Romney has wandered a long way from courage. There are those who say, cynically, if this is the dim-witted freak show the Republicans want to present in 2012, so be it. I disagree. One of them could get elected. You never know. Mick Huckabee, the front-runner if you can believe it, might have to negotiate a trade agreement, or a defense treaty, with the Indonesian President some day. Newt might have to discuss very delicate matters of national security with the President of Pakistan. And so I plead, as an unflinching American patriot--please Mitch Daniels, please Jeb Bush, please run. I may not agree with you on most things, but I respect you. And you seem to respect yourselves enough not to behave like public clowns.
Friday, March 18, 2011
A Koan
Posted by
wobblie
If everybody in the running for GOP nomination in 2012 is in the chase pack, couldn't we say that no one is the chase pack? Or if there is, even, a chase pack?
Labels:
2012,
chase pack,
GOP go splat
Monday, December 21, 2009
Chasepack Where Are They Now: Crying for Rudy edition
Posted by
lex dexter
Report: Rudy outThe Daily News, which recently suggested Rudy Giuliani was on the verge of a Senate bid, reports that he'll declare tomorrow he's not running.
The lede: "So long, Rudy."
Labels:
chase pack,
don't call it a 'chasepack',
rudy
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Rocks Off! Chasepack GOP PACs
Posted by
lex dexter
Do I have reason to believe I might get a chance to dig Eric Cantor [R-VA] vibes in a few early primary debates circa 2012? Might I glom some Huckabee-on-Santorum values-athons?
from Marc Ambinder
from Marc Ambinder
Here's a list of other possible 2012 hopefuls, their PACs, listed by the amount of money raised + given so far this year. (Bobby Jindal is not included in the list; I couldn't get an official answer on whether he has a PAC, but signs of one are non-existent, and a Louisiana political operative I talked to hadn't heard of one.)
Mitt Romney, Free and Strong America PAC:
$2,318,789 raised, $1,845,423 given
Eric Cantor:
$1,004,593 raised, $983,451 given
Rick Santorum, America's Foundation:
$494,547 raised, $556,905 given
Sarah Palin, SarahPAC:
$732,867 raised, $276,200 given
Mike Huckabee, Huck PAC:
$304,673 raised, $336,589 given
Mike Pence, Pen PAC:
$115,588 raised, $111,593 given
Haley Barbour, Haley's PAC:
$14,050 raised, $14,560 given
Ron Paul, Liberty PAC:
$1,221 raised, $24,871 given
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Horn of Chasepack(s) -- Then and Now
Posted by
lex dexter
Huck's win - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
Ah, these two little-bitty anecdotes are nice gestures in the direction of the inevitable. Be it sooner, later, or whenever: the blithely anti-government, anti-politics, anti-politician Tea Party movement is going to be pressured back into a) electoral politics, b) candidate-based activism and, c) the (impossible) necessity of sullying themselves with the businesses of governing and government.
The WWE wing of the GOP? - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
Linda McMahon Has Some Talent Working For Her - The Atlantic Politics Channel
No, seriously, Linda McMahon -- WWE co-founder, spouse of the ever-annoying Vince McMahon -- is entering the Republican primary to dance with (ultimate chasepack legend) Chris Dodd. See below for a true, true, too-true summation of McMahon's prospects that amounts ever-so-pleasantly to a textbook example of damning-with-faint-praise:
"At some level it's not a surprise that someone with a lot of money who is bored in her job would run," said Roy Occhiogrosso, a veteran Democratic strategist and Dodd supporter. "It certainly lends itself to all kinds of interesting metaphors."

Friday, December 12, 2008
(horn) friday nite Sprites
Posted by
lex dexter
- prisonship seasonal phonics (prisonship forensic rorschach) « The PrisonShip really, nobody's hitting up the Advent thread? do you not believe that the Prisonship has re-risen for some indefinite interval?
- Pearl Jam to reissue Ten in four different packages when i told frequent commenter robes about this development, he unwrapped his salmon wrap and cried into the spinach tortilla. anyway, that's how i remember it.
- Kids in the Hall reuniting for new series i hope this doesn't turn out to be underwhelming.
- Ben Smith's Blog: Clintonites against Kennedy i cannot get enough from this NY chasepack saga.
- Obama's Smoking Drama what brand do you think BHO smokes? i'd say either Marlboro Reds or Camel Lights. Winston Lights on the outside.
Labels:
around the horn,
chase pack
Thursday, December 11, 2008
NY Sen. Chasepack: Fran Drescher
Posted by
lex dexter

Labels:
chase pack,
staffing up
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
MR for Car Czar?
Posted by
lex dexter


Labels:
chase pack,
romney,
trots for romney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)